Anthropic · Released Aug 5, 2025

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 is an updated version of Anthropic’s flagship model, offering improved performance in coding, reasoning, and agentic tasks. It achieves 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified and shows notable gains...

ReasoningVision
  • Top 8%Lech Mazur Writing
  • Top 24%GDPval
  • Top 40%Cybench
  • Top 40%SimpleBench
Released
Aug 5 2025
Context window
200K 32K out
Input / 1M tokens
$15.00 from $13.00
Output / 1M tokens
$75.00 from $64.00

Where to run it

15 providers compared

Cheapest: Poe at $13.00 / $64.00 per 1M input / output tokens — 14% less than the priciest option.

ProviderInputOutputCache readContextMax outputUptimevs. best
Poe $13.00 $64.00 $1.30197K32K— Cheapest
Amazon Bedrock $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K100%24h +17%
Helicone $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
NanoGPT $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
Kilo Gateway $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
Databricks $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
Pioneer $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
Requesty $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
FastRouter $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
DigitalOcean $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K8K— +17%
ZenMux $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
Azure $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
Neon $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
Azure Cognitive Services $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%
OpenCode $15.00 $75.00 $1.50200K32K— +17%

Value

Price vs. performance

74 models score higher for the same price or lesson GPQA Diamond, e.g. Gemini 4 Argon.
23.2%47.6%72.0%96.4% $0.001$0.01$0.10$1.00$10.00$100.00 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (DeepSeek) — 93.2% · $0.15/1M in Gemini 4 Argon (Google) — 96.4% · $2.00/1M in Mistral Large 4 (Mistral) — 88.1% · $1.36/1M in GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) — 95.4% · $2.00/1M in GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) — 90.5% · $0.10/1M in GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI) — 94.3% · $2.00/1M in Grok 4.7 (xAI) — 92.7% · $2.00/1M in DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) — 93.2% · $0.30/1M in GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) — 95.8% · $10.00/1M in Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (Qwen) — 92.7% · $2.00/1M in Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) — 95.4% · $0.82/1M in GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai) — 90.1% · $0.005/1M in GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) — 90.9% · $0.079/1M in Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) — 94.8% · $0.75/1M in DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) — 91.7% · $0.66/1M in Grok 4.6 (xAI) — 94.0% · $2.00/1M in DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek) — 91.0% · $0.044/1M in Qwen3.7 Flash (Qwen) — 82.3% · $0.03/1M in Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) — 94.1% · $0.75/1M in Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google) — 83.3% · $0.30/1M in Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) — 93.1% · $0.24/1M in GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) — 91.6% · $0.20/1M in GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) — 93.3% · $2.00/1M in GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) — 93.5% · $4.00/1M in Grok 4.5 (xAI) — 93.4% · $2.00/1M in GLM 5.2 (Z.ai) — 91.9% · $0.034/1M in Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot AI) — 87.9% · $0.67/1M in Qwen3.7 Plus (Qwen) — 87.9% · $0.32/1M in MiniMax M3 (MiniMax) — 90.9% · $0.30/1M in Qwen3.7 Max (Qwen) — 90.9% · $1.48/1M in Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google) — 92.8% · $1.50/1M in Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Google) — 81.8% · $0.25/1M in Grok 4.3 (xAI) — 88.8% · $1.25/1M in Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (Qwen) — 84.9% · $0.30/1M in Qwen3.6 Flash (Qwen) — 83.3% · $0.19/1M in Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Qwen) — 84.9% · $0.10/1M in Qwen3.6 27B (Qwen) — 85.9% · $0.25/1M in GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) — 90.7% · $5.00/1M in DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 (DeepSeek) — 91.7% · $0.44/1M in DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 (DeepSeek) — 91.0% · $0.091/1M in Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot AI) — 90.8% · $0.65/1M in GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) — 89.9% · $1.40/1M in Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) — 73.2% · $0.09/1M in Gemma 4 31B (Google) — 75.8% · $0.20/1M in Qwen3.6 Plus (Qwen) — 88.4% · $0.33/1M in GPT-5.4 Nano (OpenAI) — 78.5% · $0.20/1M in GPT-5.4 Mini (OpenAI) — 86.9% · $0.75/1M in Mistral Small 4 (Mistral) — 47.5% · $0.15/1M in Qwen3.5-9B (Qwen) — 79.0% · $0.08/1M in GPT-5.4 Pro (OpenAI) — 94.6% · $30.00/1M in GPT-5.4 (OpenAI) — 93.3% · $2.50/1M in Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (Google) — 81.8% · $0.25/1M in Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (Qwen) — 83.5% · $0.14/1M in Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) — 94.4% · $2.00/1M in Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) — 86.4% · $0.50/1M in GLM 5 (Z.ai) — 87.8% · $1.00/1M in GLM 4.7 Flash (Z.ai) — 60.5% · $0.061/1M in GLM 4.7 (Z.ai) — 83.3% · $0.54/1M in Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Google) — 89.4% · $0.50/1M in GPT-5.2 (OpenAI) — 91.4% · $1.75/1M in Ministral 3 8B 2512 (Mistral) — 27.2% · $0.15/1M in Ministral 3 3B 2512 (Mistral) — 25.3% · $0.10/1M in Mistral Large 3 2512 (Mistral) — 51.3% · $0.50/1M in GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) — 87.6% · $1.25/1M in GPT-5 (OpenAI) — 86.2% · $1.25/1M in GPT-5 Mini (OpenAI) — 75.0% · $0.25/1M in GPT-5 Nano (OpenAI) — 69.4% · $0.05/1M in gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI) — 75.8% · $0.15/1M in gpt-oss-20b (OpenAI) — 60.8% · $0.018/1M in Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 (Qwen) — 55.6% · $0.09/1M in Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 (Qwen) — 80.0% · $0.45/1M in Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 (Qwen) — 70.7% · $0.09/1M in Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) — 85.3% · $1.25/1M in Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (Google) — 85.3% · $1.25/1M in R1 0528 (DeepSeek) — 76.3% · $0.50/1M in Qwen3 30B A3B (Qwen) — 61.7% · $0.12/1M in Qwen3 14B (Qwen) — 63.8% · $0.12/1M in Qwen3 32B (Qwen) — 65.7% · $0.08/1M in o3 (OpenAI) — 81.8% · $2.00/1M in o4 Mini (OpenAI) — 79.6% · $1.10/1M in GPT-4.1 (OpenAI) — 66.9% · $2.00/1M in GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI) — 65.8% · $0.40/1M in GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI) — 48.9% · $0.10/1M in Gemma 3 4B (Google) — 23.2% · $0.04/1M in Gemma 3 12B (Google) — 39.5% · $0.05/1M in Gemma 3 27B (Google) — 47.7% · $0.08/1M in Qwen-Plus (Qwen) — 48.1% · $0.26/1M in o3 Mini (OpenAI) — 77.0% · $1.10/1M in Phi 4 (Microsoft) — 56.1% · $0.07/1M in DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) — 71.2% · $0.26/1M in o1 (OpenAI) — 76.8% · $15.00/1M in Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta) — 47.4% · $0.10/1M in GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (OpenAI) — 49.2% · $2.50/1M in Mistral Large 2407 (Mistral) — 51.3% · $2.00/1M in Llama 3.2 1B Instruct (Meta) — 23.9% · $0.027/1M in GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (OpenAI) — 49.2% · $2.50/1M in Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (Meta) — 44.2% · $0.40/1M in Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (Meta) — 27.0% · $0.05/1M in GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI) — 37.7% · $0.15/1M in GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) (OpenAI) — 37.7% · $0.15/1M in Gemma 2 27B (Google) — 36.5% · $0.65/1M in GPT-4o (OpenAI) — 49.2% · $2.50/1M in GPT-4o (2024-05-13) (OpenAI) — 49.2% · $5.00/1M in GPT-4 Turbo (OpenAI) — 46.6% · $10.00/1M in Mistral Large (Mistral) — 51.3% · $2.00/1M in GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) (OpenAI) — 28.0% · $1.00/1M in GPT-3.5 Turbo (OpenAI) — 28.0% · $0.50/1M in GPT-4 (OpenAI) — 35.7% · $30.00/1M in Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) — 89.6% · $0.10/1M in Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) — 95.6% · $2.00/1M in Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) — 90.6% · $4.00/1M in Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) — 93.9% · $5.00/1M in Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) — 90.5% · $2.00/1M in Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) — 85.9% · $10.00/1M in Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) — 91.0% · $5.00/1M in Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) — 90.1% · $5.00/1M in Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) — 87.4% · $3.00/1M in Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) — 90.5% · $5.00/1M in Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) — 86.1% · $5.00/1M in Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) — 71.2% · $1.00/1M in Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) — 82.3% · $3.00/1M in Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic) — 77.3% · $15.00/1M in Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 Other Anthropic Other labs Value frontier · GPQA Diamond vs. input price per 1M tokens (log scale) · Drag to pan, pinch or Ctrl + scroll to zoom, double-click to zoom in.

Benchmarks

16 benchmark scores

BenchmarkScoreRankLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware engineering · Real GitHub issues fixed in Python repos 73.4% #19of 32 Claude Opus 4.783.5%
Terminal-BenchSoftware engineering · Tasks completed with the programs in a real terminal (best agent) 38.0% #25of 40 GPT-5.584.7%
METR time horizonSoftware engineering · Length of software task solved more often than not 1.9 h #11of 23 Claude Opus 4.612 h
GDPvalAgents & computer use · Real-world occupational tasks, win rate vs experts 43.6% #3of 13 GPT-5.249.7%
Lech Mazur WritingWriting & content · Short stories weaving 10 required elements, judged 0–10 8.47/10 #2of 27 GPT-58.60/10
DeepResearch BenchWriting & content · Find and synthesize information from the web 48.3% #9of 21 Claude Opus 4.655.3%
WebDev ArenaDesign & visual · People vote on which model builds the better website (Elo) 1389 #66of 90 Claude Opus 5.51820
VPCTDesign & visual · Read diagrams of balls rolling down ramps 35.0% #16of 18 GPT-5.284.0%
CybenchCybersecurity · Find and exploit vulnerabilities in sandboxed challenges 42.0% #4of 10 Claude Opus 4.693.0%
GPQA DiamondReasoning & knowledge · PhD-level biology, chemistry and physics questions 77.3% #76of 122 Gemini 4 Argon96.4%
Humanity's Last ExamReasoning & knowledge · Expert questions across 100+ subjects 11.5% #21of 32 GPT-6 Astra54.8%
SimpleBenchReasoning & knowledge · Common-sense trick questions about space, time and people 60.0% #23of 58 Claude Fable 581.9%
LMCAReasoning & knowledge · Judge the quality of conceptual arguments like experts 37.1% #62of 123 Claude Sonnet 5.568.3%
FrontierMathMaths · Expert-written problems, undergrad to early research (tiers 1–3) 12.6% #76of 87 GPT-6.1 Sol93.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4Maths · Exceptionally hard research-level problems 2.4% #58of 64 GPT-6.1 Sol100.0%
OTIS Mock AIMEMaths · Competition-style problems harder than MATH Level 5 68.9% #83of 120 Gemini 4 Argon100.0%

Specs

Details

Model ID
anthropic/claude-opus-4.1
Developer
Anthropic
Release date
Aug 5, 2025 ·
Context window
200,000 tokens
Max output
32,000 tokens
API price
$15.00 / $75.00 per 1M input / output tokens
Providers
15
Input types
image, text, file
Reasoning
Yes
Tool calling
Yes
Open weights
No
Free tier
No

Release date and prices from OpenRouter's catalog; providers from OpenRouter and models.dev. Buying directly from a provider can cost a little differently. Speed, latency and uptime are measured on OpenRouter only; uptime is the share of OpenRouter requests each provider served over the last day. Benchmark scores are the best result per benchmark from Epoch AI, licensed CC BY 4.0. Rank counts every model tracked here with a score.